Chris McCandless on his journey met many people on his adventures. These people changed in different ways because of this man. McCandless met a man named Ron Franz, but after McCandless’s death, Franz "couldn't believe in a God who would let something that terrible happen to a boy like Alex"(60). This shows what kind of impact McCandless has on people. Even if people thought he was dirty or gross; there were those close to him that thought otherwise. These people were able to understand his feelings and get to know him.
McCandless is able to influence people around him unintentionally. His actions were able to speak louder than his words; his journey allowed him to change himself and others. McCandless meets Gaylord Stuckey, although Stuckey is unable to give hitchhikers rides, McCandless's presence alters his decisions. When they rode together "Stuckey had come to enjoy McCandless's company he changed his mind"(159). McCandless was able to show Stuckey he wasn't just some hitchhiker, he was a person.
When McCandless left his mother without a words, she was hurt. Just as any mother is worried when their son is gone, she is the same. His mother "breaks down from time to time, weeping as only a mother who has outlived a child can weep, betraying a sense of loss "(132).McCandless may have just been a hitchhiker, but he meant a great deal to others. His mom loved him.
McCandless may not have believed himself as a huge impact, but others belief in him show otherwise. His actions although they may not seem great seem to great to others, his adventures are now a book and even a movie. These are just some demonstration about how great McCandless's journey was. McCandless's journey to discover himself revealed that he allowed others to find themselves along the journey. His journey needs admiration for his ability to influence others, not the adventure itself.
It would be a good idea to cite evidence from the book to support your argument. Also, some grammatical errors are present, so they might undermine your credibility. It would be good to proofread one more time.
ReplyDeleteThe second paragraph doesn't fit with topic of the post in my opinion. It describes how other people helped McCandless when the topic should've been on how McCandless impacted other people. Instead you persist that this is somehow related to McCandless impacting others to the point where it doesn't make sense.
ReplyDeleteThe evidence presented should be better developed and show a more analytical approach to interpreting the text. Also, it would be wise to read you work out load so that it is easier to catch grammatical errors.
ReplyDeleteIt would be better if you proofread the post so catch some grammatical errors. Also citing evidence will help with the ideas presented.
ReplyDelete